Republicans Can Win the Immigration Reform Battle

By Alex Nowrasteh, Competitive Enterprise Institute

Arizona’s new strict anti-immigration law SB 1070 is the most recent and loudest salvo in the immigration debate. President Obama and the Democratic leadership announced that their next legislative priority will be tackling that open sore of American public policy. But instead of fighting them tooth and nail, Republicans should steal the Democrats' thunder and propose their own version of immigration reform that goes beyond enforcement. Unlike passing legislation like SB 1070 in Arizona, it’s the “conservative” thing to do and it makes political sense.

Former President Bush garnered roughly 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2004. That’s because they typically vote like other working-class Americans. But Republican pronouncements about deporting every illegal immigrant could destroy that political balance and shift them into a permanent Democratic voting bloc.

41 percent of Hispanics feared a deportation action against a friend or family member. Family values-oriented conservatives should understand that no matter a person’s politics, he will do anything to defend his family. That’s especially true for Hispanics, who tend to be very family values oriented. That includes forsaking every other political opinion he has and voting for the political party that he thinks won’t deport his grandmother.

Deportation rhetoric only pushes Hispanics, a natural conservative constituency, away from the Republican Party. They tend to be socially conservative and hostile to confiscatory taxes and regulation. They are generally poor but hard-working and entrepreneurial. Most of them have recent bad memories of confiscatory left-wing Latin American governments. They sound and act like conservatives and a reasonable Republican position on immigration could politically capture them.

Republicans should propose a reform that makes legal migration easier, cheaper, and quicker. It shouldn’t take over a decade for a lucky low-skilled Mexican worker to get a green card. A responsible middle ground on amnesty also needs to be proposed. 10.8 million illegal immigrants are not all going to be deported or convinced to leave. Fees, fines, language requirements, prohibiting access to government benefits and more in exchange for a path to legal status are smart and realistic conservative compromises.

Former House leader Dick Armey recently said, “Who in the Republican Party was the genius that said that now that we have identified the fastest-growing voting demographic in America, let’s go out and alienate them? . . . The Republican Party is the most naturally talented party at losing its natural constituents in the history of the world. This party was born with the emancipation proclamation and can’t get a black vote to save its life. How do they do that? Well, the same thing with the Hispanics.”

Republicans are traditionally the political party that fights against economic regulation. If that is still true, they should take a principled stand against big-government measures like E-Verify and a national biometric ID card that put enormous burdens on business. They should also welcome legalization and increased legal flows of future migrants. It would steal the Democratic Party’s thunder, make the Republicans the pro-immigration party, and open up political opportunities in major cities closed to Republicans for decades.

Besides the political opportunities, increasing legal migration is the only immigration policy option for conservatives. Take competitive free markets. Conservatives know that business competition improves standards of living. Therefore we should welcome more immigrants, not shun them. Real conservatives are not afraid of economic competition.

Conservatives rightly value the rule of law and national security. Security provides an environment where the law can be applied equally while the law provides a framework through which security can be legitimized. But our current immigration laws would require a police state to enforce consistently.

Conservatives understand the threat of Islamist terrorism in the post-9/11 world. Instead of wasting scarce security resources keeping out the millions of Indian and Chinese computer programmers and low-skilled laborers, we should devote those border resources to blocking security threats. An immigration policy that weeds out suspected terrorists and criminals will focus law enforcement, not continually dissipate it in a vain attempt to manipulate labor markets.

Finally, to uphold an old American tradition, Conservatives should support legal mass migration. This nation was founded by immigrants. English, Irish, Scottish, German, and Swedish immigrants dominated the 13 colonies before independence. Conservatives should especially remember that one of the complaints against King George III written in the Declaration of Independence was that:

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

The Tea Parties have harkened back to the Founding Fathers and their original intent. They are right to do so, but we should also take the words of the Founders seriously.

Basing our immigration policy on American traditions, support for free-markets, and in defense of the rule of law will guarantee the Republicans political victory and grant our nation prosperity. Like most policies that are good for America, a reasonable stand on legalization that drops deportation rhetoric and supports legal mass migration are the Conservative things to do.

15 comments (Add your own)

1. ddrzoj wrote:
ki0Gp9 txeghkidwpbo

Wed, September 7, 2011 @ 8:03 AM

2. tqrfcxle wrote:
IdFp7S syfxvrpqwnzd

Fri, September 9, 2011 @ 3:49 AM

3. Charles wrote:
Regarding the citing of the Declaration of Independence-- my understanding of that passage is that: (1) there was a dispute between the then-colonies and the Crown over who controlled immigration and naturalization. If the colonies were part of Great Britain, then the colonial legislatures had no business making laws on immigration- that was a matter for the mother country; (2) Another part of it is that King George was attempting to honor treaties made with the Native American tribes. The colonies wanted to expand westward. They wanted immigrants to settle on lands that the crown recognized as belonging to Native American tribes.

So it has nothing to do with some kind of hallowed American immigration tradition to be respected. It was a simple jurisdictional class, and the shameful story of violating treaties with Native Americans.

The above is a specific example of how Nowrasteh doesn't know what he is talking about. The whole article is flawed in the same way.

Tue, January 24, 2012 @ 7:23 AM

4. Oladele wrote:
Both the Wall Street Journal and SourceWatch are reporting that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has spent $34.7 mloiiln dollars in the past three months alone to curry favor with our Congress. That's over $300,000 a day, to fight things like health care reform and the Employee Free Choice Act. That's more than five times the amount they spent in the previous 3 months. While they like to portray themselves as the defender of small business in the heartland, their biggest financial support has come from the oil companies (ExxonMobil and Chevron Texaco, to fight climate change legislation), and Big Pharma (Phizer, to prevent Medicare from competitve price bidding on meds for our seniors). If health care reform finally passes in this country, will the Chamber of Commerce come to the Hill asking for a refund? And will the cons try to give it to them?

Sun, September 2, 2012 @ 3:45 AM

5. sqjiuclsy wrote:
GjItTn qjhqzqkjhgsj

Sun, September 2, 2012 @ 3:28 PM

6. Kaylan wrote:
Thanks for being on point and on traegt!

Mon, October 8, 2012 @ 11:11 AM

7. wrote:
Magnificent goods from you, man. I've bear in mind your stuff previous to and you are just too excellent.
I really like what you've received right here, really like what you
are stating and the best way wherein you assert it.
You are making it enjoyable and you still
care for to stay it sensible. I can't wait to learn much more from you.

That is actually a terrific web site.

Wed, May 8, 2019 @ 8:13 PM

8. wrote:
Greetings I am so excited I found your web site, I really found you by error, while I was researching on Digg for something else, Nonetheless I
am here now and would just like to say cheers for a
remarkable post and a all round exciting blog (I
also love the theme/design), I don't have time to read through it
all at the moment but I have book-marked it and also added
your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a
lot more, Please do keep up the great work.

Sun, May 12, 2019 @ 8:38 AM

9. wrote:
Hi there, I enjoy reading through your post. I like to
write a little comment to support you.

Fri, June 14, 2019 @ 7:06 PM

10. wrote:
An outstanding share! I have just forwarded this onto a co-worker who
was doing a little homework on this. And he in fact ordered me
breakfast because I discovered it for him... lol. So allow me to
reword this.... Thanks for the meal!! But yeah, thanks
for spending the time to talk about this issue here on your blog.

Mon, June 17, 2019 @ 8:03 AM

11. wrote:
I constantly spent my half an hour to read this webpage's
articles or reviews daily along with a cup of coffee.

Wed, July 10, 2019 @ 11:00 PM

12. wrote:
If some one wants to be updated with most recent technologies afterward he must be pay a quick visit this web site and
be up to date every day.

Mon, July 15, 2019 @ 9:00 AM

13. wrote:
You actually make it seem so easy together with your presentation however I to find
this matter to be actually something that I think I might never understand.
It kind of feels too complicated and extremely vast for me.

I am taking a look forward on your next publish, I will
try to get the hold of it!

Wed, July 17, 2019 @ 1:19 AM

14. wrote:
Hello! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout
out and tell you I truly enjoy reading through your posts.
Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same subjects?
Thanks a lot!

Wed, July 17, 2019 @ 7:34 PM

15. wrote:
Thanks for finally writing about >Republicans Can Win the Immigration Reform Battle |
The Vernon K. Krieble Foundation Wed, September 25, 2019 @ 11:55 AM

Add a New Comment


Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.