National Poll Shows Guest Workers Should Be Determined By Employer Demand, Not Government

Red Card Guest Worker Permit proposal supported across partisan and demographic lines in POS/Ciruli poll

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The number of guest workers allowed under any immigration reform bill should be determined by employer demand and not government quotas according to a new national poll released today.  The poll was conducted by Public Opinion Strategies and Ciruli and Associates, and sponsored by the Vernon K. Krieble Foundation.

When asked whether private employers or the federal government should determine the number of guest worker permits made available and distributed to non-citizens, 65 percent said employer demand and the need for guest workers to fill jobs that cannot be filled by American workers while 27 percent said the federal government should set quotas on the numbers of jobs filled by guest workers.

"It is very clear from this national poll that a workable, employer driven guest worker program is the cornerstone of any immigration reform," said Helen Krieble, founder and president of the Vernon K. Krieble Foundation.  "We need to get this right with employers, not government quotas, determining the number of guest workers."

The Vernon K. Krieble Foundation has created an employer driven Red Card Guest Worker Permit proposal (http://www.redcardsolution.com/) and the poll tested six critical components of Red Card:

--Require guest workers to pass a security background check and have a job before coming into the country, 90 percent favor, 9 percent oppose.

--Receive a guest worker permit "smart card" that includes a photograph of the worker, employment information, and biometric data such as fingerprints, 85 percent in favor, 14 percent oppose.

--Guest workers would be able to renew their work permit without leaving the U.S., 83 percent in favor, 16 percent oppose.

--The guest worker permit smart card would be for a set period of time and have an expiration date, 81 percent in favor, 16 percent oppose.

--The guest worker permit program would be a way for non-citizens to legally live and work in the U.S. and provides no special treatment or advantage toward citizenship which is a completely separate process, 76 percent in favor, 21 percent oppose.

--Guest workers would be able to switch employers without having to reapply for a new work permit, 59 percent in favor, 40 percent oppose.

Overall, 79 percent said they would support an employer driven guest worker program such as Red Card while 19 percent opposed it.  Strong support existed in all four regions of the nation with 73 percent favoring the proposal in the Northeast with 25 percent opposing; 80 percent to 17 percent in the Midwest; 83 percent to 16 percent in the South; and 79 percent to 18 percent in the West.

Strong support also was found among all ethnic groups with the highest being among Hispanics/Latinos.  Whites supported the proposal 77 percent to 20 percent, African Americans 85 percent to 15 percent, and Hispanics/Latinos 87 percent to 12 percent.
Voters also strongly agreed that "The best way to get control of our border is to have a system for handling guest workers.  Without a guest worker program, we are just inviting more illegal border crossings" with 71 percent agreeing with that statement and 26 percent opposing.

The poll also tested several criticisms of the Red Card Guest Worker Permit proposal including guest workers would bring families with them and increase taxpayer costs for schools and hospitals, and corporations only want to hire cheap labor at the expense of American workers.  After these criticisms were tested, overall support for an employer driven guest worker program remained very high at 69 percent and 29 percent opposed.
Partisan support for the proposal was also strong across the board with 59 percent of Republicans in favor and 38 percent opposed, Independents 61 percent favor and 36 percent opposed, and Democrats 81 percent support and 18 percent opposed.

The national poll was conducted from March 23 through March 27, 2013 of 700 registered voters and has a margin of error of 3.7 percent.  Two nationally respected pollsters, Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies of Alexandria, Virginia and Floyd Ciruli of Ciruli and Associates of Denver, Colorado jointly conducted the poll.  Click here to view the executive summary.

The Vernon K. Krieble Foundation of Denver, Colorado is non-partisan public policy think-tank that seeks solutions to modern problems based on founding principles.  Helen Krieble is the founder and president of the foundation.  She also owns and operates the Colorado Horse Park, an international equestrian events center, in Parker, Colorado.

9 comments (Add your own)

1. Nancy wrote:
We so enjoyed last nitghs' Crushpad dinner! The Ivy Wild selections were delicious and so were all the wines you had for us to try! For our glass of wine, four of us chose 4 different wines and then chose the syrah for dinner! Excellent! The music was soft and nice for dinner conversations, but the real entertainment was watching Maria and her helicopter service to you and the cherries! That was amazing to watch. We used helicopters for our Christmas tree harvest years ago and the name of the game for that was speed! For cherry tree operations, it is just the opposite! Do hope that worked for you last night! Thank you for a great evening, and we look forward to joining you again for another Crushpad dinner event!

Thu, June 6, 2013 @ 6:08 AM

2. laliwaiocd wrote:
64kxuX , [url=http://foiugvpmuqjt.com/]foiugvpmuqjt[/url], [link=http://wjjrzqegfjbc.com/]wjjrzqegfjbc[/link], http://bjaxtyiqqvil.com/

Tue, June 11, 2013 @ 5:18 PM

3. Kalea wrote:
viagra online :[[[ impotence association =-(( accutane >:PP viagra for cheap :OO

Thu, August 1, 2013 @ 6:38 PM

4. Hayle wrote:
price car insurance comparison ukwe Viagra purchase 2549 Order Cialis online :-[ predinone on line ycjj cheap Vigra =-] where to buy viagra 3878

Sun, August 4, 2013 @ 1:58 PM

5. Cherlin wrote:
insurance car site 7052 nj auto insurance %PP viagra cialis levitra 29375 best quality cialis online 10952 viagra =[[[

Sat, August 17, 2013 @ 11:06 AM

6. daf wrote:
Good text. Warsztat samoobslugowy poznan Thanks you Malarnia proszkowa Poznan Welcome you Blog motoryzacyjny

Wed, September 25, 2013 @ 4:52 PM

7. Chuck Boust wrote:
I heard a recent radio spot referring to the illegal immigration issue stating there should be no action taken to secure our borders and that these people breaking our laws are only looking for employment. The solution, of course, is more government! This from an organization that purports to stand for freedom!?
Try this for a solution - Abolish minimum wage laws, unemployment compensation, government welfare and any other such nonsense that encourages sloth and dependency of our citizens on government. This would go a long way to eliminating any labor shortage and also benefit our society greatly by restoring the value of labor to its rightful place!

Fri, October 18, 2013 @ 9:45 AM

8. Sandra R. Taumanis wrote:
I agree that folks must make their own decisions as far as selecting their own healthplans, esp. Medicare ones. However, since working the past three years in a seasonal job in insurance for exactly these healthplans, I wanted to add my own comments. I work for the healthcare exchange, which contracts with Corporations that have discontinued their faithful employee's group coverages even after retirement. However, the company's many times do give to these employees a rather generous Health Reimbursement Account,sometimes for thousands of dollars. What this HRA account can do is pay for the person's medical expenses with a Medicare healthplan. If the retiree/employee chooses the most economical plan, they may even not pay anything for health coverage, depending of course on what part of the country they do live in and the plans available to them by region. It does, I suppose rather coerce them into having to buy through my company, as receiving the Health Reimbursement Account funds is contingent upon them enrolling with a plan that we offer. Because of the way US has gone, it's not always the best for everyone, but not as bad as some make it out to be either.
What would be the answer to having folks buy healthplans on their own? As these would not be cheap, by any means?

Mon, May 5, 2014 @ 8:41 PM

9. huqlkmg wrote:
huqlkmg

Thu, May 8, 2014 @ 9:59 PM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.